Incremental processing in the pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present an eye-tracking experiment investigating the time course with which listeners derive pragmatic inferences from contextual information. We used as a test case the construction “It looks like an X” pronounced either with (a) a nuclear pitch accent on the final noun, or (b) a contrastive L+H* pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support a complex contrastive inference (e.g., It LOOKS like a zebra...(but it is not)). The contrastive intonational contour elicited higher proportions of fixations to non-prototypical target pictures (e.g., a zebra-like animal) during the earliest moments of processing the target noun. Further, when the display only contained a single related pair of pictures, effects of the contrastive accent on “looks” emerged prior to the target noun, indicating that efficient referential resolution is supported by rapidly generated inferences based on visual and prosodic context.
منابع مشابه
Rapid adaptation in online pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody
The realization of prosody varies across speakers, accents, and speech conditions. Listeners must navigate this variability to converge on consistent prosodic interpretations. We investigate whether listeners adapt to speaker-specific realization of prosody based on recent exposure and, if so, whether such adaptation is rapidly integrated with online pragmatic processing. We used the visual-wor...
متن کاملContextual inferences over speakers' pragmatic intentions: Preschoolers' comprehension of contrastive prosody
We investigate pre-schoolers’ ability in drawing pragmatic inferences based on prosodic information. Previous work has found that young children are generally oblivious to intonational meaning of utterances. In particular, the ability to comprehend contrastive prosody develops late during language acquisition (after the age of 6). In three experiments, we show that preschoolers can engage in pr...
متن کاملPragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody: It looks like speech adaptation
Drawing on insights from recent work on phonetic adaptation, we examined how listeners interpret prosodic cues to two opposing pragmatic meanings of the phrase “It looks like an X” (e.g., “It looks like a zebra (and it is one)” and “It LOOKS like a zebra (but its actually not)”. After establishing that different prosodic contours map onto these meanings (Experiment 1), we demonstrated that pros...
متن کاملUncorrected Proof. Making Disjunctions Exclusive
This work examines how people interpret the sentential connective “or”, which can be viewed either inclusively (A or B or both) or exclusively (A or B but not both). Following up on prior work concerning quantifiers (Noveck, 2001; Noveck & Posada, 2003; Bott & Noveck, 2004) which shows that the common pragmatic interpretation of “some,” some but not all, is conveyed as part of an effortful step...
متن کاملIs it or isn't it: listeners make rapid use of prosody to infer speaker meanings.
A visual world experiment examined the time course for pragmatic inferences derived from visual context and contrastive intonation contours. We used the construction It looks like an X pronounced with either (a) a H(*) pitch accent on the final noun and a low boundary tone, or (b) a contrastive L+H(*) pitch accent and a rising boundary tone, a contour that can support contrastive inference (e.g...
متن کامل